SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 1013

2024 DHC 5609
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, Amit Sharma, JJ.
Vandana - Petitioner
Versus
State Through Sho PS Amar Colony & Anr. - Respondents
W.P.(CRL) 2071 of 2024
Decided On : 30-07-2024
Advocates Appeared :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Dinesh Malik, Adv., alongwith Mr. Puneet Jain and Ms. Kiffi Aggarwal, Advs.
For the Respondent : Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel with Insp. Rizwan PS Amar Colony. Mr. Sushil Raaja, Adv. with Mr. Ankur Singh Chauhan and Mr. Deepak Soni, Deputy Director of UIDAI and Assistant Director, Legal of UIDAI.

The court ruled that in habeas corpus cases, disclosure of personal data, such as Aadhaar information, may be permitted without prior consent due to urgency, provided confidentiality is maintained.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016 - Sections 28 and 33 - Writ of habeas corpus - Petition filed for production of the missing mother since 15th May, 2019 - Court directed UIDAI to provide updated information of the missing person, granting urgency due to potential danger to her safety. (Paras 2, 10, 11)

(B) Personal Data Protection - The information contained in an Aadhaar card is deemed private; however, exceptions exist in habeas corpus cases where immediate action may necessitate the disclosure of such data. (Paras 9, 11)

(C) Judicial Precedent - Reference to Justice K.S. Puttuswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India underscoring the privacy rights of individuals in relation to Aadhaar data and the requirement for due process before the disclosure of information. (Paras 8, 9)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner, seeking her mother who has been missing since 2019, filed a writ petition. Despite ongoing efforts by police, her whereabouts remain unknown. UIDAI provided updated Aadhaar data to assist in the investigation.

Findings of Court:
The latest available information from UIDAI was directed to be handed over to Delhi Police for investigation, emphasizing the necessity to act promptly in such circumstances.

Issues: The primary question concerned the balance between privacy rights associated with Aadhaar data and the urgent need to locate a missing person.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that in certain cases like habeas corpus, the urgency allows for the disclosure of Aadhaar data without prior consent, provided that confidentiality is maintained.

Result: A status report directed from the Delhi Police regarding the updating of information was ordered, ensuring the Court remains informed on developments.

JUDGMENT :

Prathiba M. Singh, J.

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The Petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking a writ of habeas corpus directing the Respondents to produce her mother, who is missing since 15th May, 2019. Continuous efforts are being made to trace the whereabouts of Petitioner’s mother.

3. Vide order dated 11th July, 2024 and 23rd July, 2024, the Court had directed the concerned officials of UIDAI to be present in Court and file a status report regarding any information in respect of the Petitioner’s mother as also her Aadhaar Card including address etc.,

4. Mr. Ankur Singh Chauhan and Mr. Deepak Soni, Deputy Director of UIDAI and Assistant Director, Legal of UIDAI respectively are present in Court. They have handed over to the Court in a sealed cover the contact details etc., available with them (without biometric data) of the missing lady, who is the mother of the Petitioner. The four different printouts, which have been shown to the Court are of data updated as on 11th August, 2011, 26th April, 2016, 21st February, 2024 and 9th July, 2024.

5. The said data also reveals that initially the Petitioner’s mother had given her address as Srinivas Puri, New Delhi and thereafter, the address given is of Rudauli, Faizabad, Uttar Pradesh and the latest data given is that she is in Ward No.2, Harijan Basti, Hansari, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh. The latest mobile number has also been mentioned.

6. The Aadhar data, as per the officials, who have appeared before the Court from the UIDAI, has to be strictly secured and cannot be released without the consent of the individual concerned. Reliance is placed on Sections 28 and 33 of the Aadhar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016 (hereinafter ‘Aadhar Act’) respectively. Section 28-‘Security and confidentiality of information’ defines the responsibility of the authority to secure the identity of the individual and Section 33- ‘Disclosure of information in certain cases’ explains the situations in which the information can be disclosed on the order of a High Court. Relevant provisions have been extracted below:

Section 28- Security and confidentiality of information:

“28. Security and confidentiality of information.—(1) The Authority shall ensure the security of identity information and authentication records of individuals.

(2) Subject to the provisions of this Act, the Authority shall ensure confidentiality of identity information and authentication records of individuals.

(3) The Authority shall take all necessary measures to ensure that the information in the possession or control of the Authority, including information stored in the Central Identities Data Repository, is secured and protected against access, use or disclosure not permitted under this Act or regulations made thereunder, and against accidental or intentional destruction, loss or damage.

(4) Without prejudice to sub-sections (1) and (2), the Authority shall (a) adopt and implement appropriate technical and organisational security measures;

(b) ensure that the agencies, consultants, advisors or other persons appointed or engaged for performing any function of the Authority under this Act, have in place appropriate technical and organisational security measures for the information; and

(c) ensure that the agreements or arrangements entered into with such agencies, consultants, advisors or other persons, impose obligations equivalent to those imposed on the Authority under this Act, and require such agencies, consultants, advisors and other persons to act only on instructions from the Authority.

(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, and save as otherwise provided in this Act, the Authority or any of its officers or other employees or any agency that maintains the Central Identities Data Rep

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top