2025:DHC:185
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J.
Bilal Ansari – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Bail APPL No. 3790 of 2024
Decided On : 14-01-2025
Advocates Appeared :
For the Appellant : Yogesh Sharma
For the Respondents : Raj Kumar, Pankaj Kumar
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of marriage and allegations of abuse. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments of both parties regarding bail. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. analysis of the facts and allegations. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court reflections on nature of cruelty. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. guiding principles for granting bail. (Para 14) |
| 6. conclusion on bail application. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
JUDGMENT :
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J.
1. The instant application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereafter ‘BNSS’) has been filed on behalf of the applicant seeking grant of anticipatory bail in case arising out of FIR bearing No. 218/2024 registered at Police Station Jyoti Nagar, Delhi for offence punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter ‘IPC’) and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
2. Briefly stated, the facts of the present case are that the marriage between the complainant and the accused was solemnized on 25.02.2022, as per Muslim customs, at the Mohammadi Masjid Kardampuri, Delhi, with the dower fixed at Rs. 20,000. The wedding reception was held on 05.03.2022 at Green Garden Farm House, Village Sabhapur, following which the complainant had retired to her in-laws' residence at New Seelampur, Delhi. At the time of the complainant’s departure, her parents and relatives had given dowry items – including a Creta car, Bullet motorcycle, gold and silver jewellery, furniture, appliances, utensils, and a sum of Rs. 5,25,000 in cash – as per the demands made by her in-laws. Additionally, the complainant’s family had performed all pre-marital ceremonies, such as engagement, Roka, Haldi, and the Nikah, as per the instructions of the in-laws, incurring significant expenses. After the marriage, the complainant had noticed a significant change in the behaviour of her in-laws. They had allegedly started taunting her over various issues, speaking harshly, and verbally abusing her family. On 25.03.2022, when the complainant had questioned her husband about this behavior, he had abused her and, along with his parents and siblings, accused her father of providing insufficient dowry. They had demanded a Fortuner car instead of the Creta and had insulted her for being outspoken. This had escalated to physical violence, with her husband slapping her, followed by beatings from the other in-laws. Over the subsequent days, her in-laws' harassment intensified. Despite fulfilling her household responsibilities, the complainant had been subjected to nightly demands to cook at odd hours. On 25.04.2022, her in-laws had demanded an additional Rs. 25,00,000 from her father, threatening to divorce her if she failed to comply. When the complainant’s parents had arranged Rs. 5,00,000 and handed it over to her father-in-law, the in-laws had assured them they would not harass her further. However, this promise had only lasted a few days before the abuse resumed. On the night of 20.06.2022, the in-laws had demanded the remaining Rs. 20,00,000 and, upon refusal, had physically assaulted the complainant. Her father-in-law had pushed her down the stairs, causing her significant injuries. Despite her injuries, her in-laws had falsely claimed to neighbors that the fall had been caused by a rat. By 01.08.2022, the complainant was allegedly moved out of her in-laws' house and left at her parents' residence. Her in-laws had retained all her belongings, including gold and silver jewelry, clothing, and essential documents such as her PAN card, Aadhaar card, and educational certificates. Despite multiple requests, these items had not been returned. While living with her parents, the complainant had given birth to a son on 22.02.2023 through a caesarean operation at K.G. Medical Center, Delhi. All the expenses had been borne by her parents. Despite being informed about the birth, her husband and in-laws had neither visited nor inquired about her or the child’s well-being. Since 01.08.2022, the complainant had been living as a fi
The court reaffirmed that both physical and emotional abuse qualify as cruelty under Section 498A, stressing the necessity of broader protections against dowry-related offenses.
Non-recovery of dowry articles alone cannot be a ground for declining anticipatory bail. The conduct of the accused, including cooperation in the recovery of dowry articles, is a relevant factor for ....
Hints at the grave implications of dowry-related murders and the judicial emphasis on denying bail in such cases.
The conduct of the accused is critical in determining anticipatory bail; misuse of interim protection can lead to denial of bail.
Anticipatory bail may be denied in serious offences where allegations are grave and custodial interrogation is necessary for a fair investigation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.