SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 894

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI – Appellant
Versus
HIRA LAL DUGGAL – Respondent


Table of Content
1. disciplines proceedings must follow due process. (Para 1 , 2 , 6)
2. timeliness of disciplinary charges is crucial. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 8)
3. court upholds tribunal's decision. (Para 9 , 19 , 20)
4. date of issuance is key to compliance. (Para 10 , 11 , 16)
5. interpretation of issuing dates is clarified. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 17 , 18)

ORDER :

1. In connection with the work undertaken the respondent Hira Lal Duggal while deputed on election duty as Assistant Returning Officer, in the Municipal Corporation of Delhi [“MCD” hereinafter] in 2007, Election Petition 47/2007 was filed before the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi. [learned "ADJ" hereinafter] The petition alleged that the respondent was guilty of having resorted to corrupt practices while on election duty, on 17 March 2007. The respondent was, at that time, working as Superintendent Grade-I in the MCD.

2. The Election Petition was disposed of by the learned ADJ vide order dated 4 June 2008, concluding that the allegations against the respondent were serious and entailed departmental and penal consequences.

3. In the interregnum, the respondent had retired on 1 February 2008.

4. In connection with the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top