SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 896

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
BIMAL ROY GAMBHIR – Appellant
Versus
DILIP GAMBHIR & OTHERS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. plaintiff seeks decree declarations and partition. (Para 1)
2. legal heirs and ownership details of property established. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. legal notice sent for partition after refusal. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. defendants assert ownership rights over the property. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
5. dispute on validity of the gift deed and possession. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
6. testimony shortcomings and evidentiary assessment. (Para 23 , 24 , 33 , 34)
7. plaintiff failed to prove gift deed was fraudulent; importance of proper execution highlighted. (Para 35 , 36 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44)

JUDGMENT :

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J.

1. The Plaintiff has approached this Court with the following prayers:-

"(i) Pass a Decree of Declaration in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants thereby declaring absolutely false, forged and fabricated Gift Deed dated 16.01.1987 and registered at Sub-Registrar, Delhi on 16.01.1987 as document no. 529 entered in Additional Book No. 01, Volume No. 5071 on pages 168 to 171, Conveyance Deed dated 17.01.2002 from DDA and registered at Sub-Registrar-VII, New Delhi on 18.01.2002 as document no. 19896 entered in Additional Book No. 01, Volume No. 7

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top