Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA
Rajesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background facts of the case and charges. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 9) |
| 2. court's analysis on evidence and inconsistencies. (Para 7 , 19 , 20) |
| 3. arguments presented by both parties on conviction. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. ratio decidendi regarding elements of charges. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. final conclusion and acquittal of the accused. (Para 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT :
CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J.
1. In this appeal filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (the Cr.P.C.), the sole accused in SC No. 118/2014 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge-01, North-West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi, assails the judgment dated 30.04.2016 and the order on sentence dated 03.05.2016 as per which he has been convicted and sentenced for the offences punishable under Sections 363 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (the IPC ) and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (the PoCSO Act).
2. The prosecution case is that the appellant/accused about 8 to 9 months before 30.04.2014, kidnapped PW10, a minor aged 15 years from the lawful guardianship of her mother (PW11), took her to the juggi of his mami, at P-1, Sultanpuri, Delhi, knowing that s
A conviction for sexual assault cannot be upheld where the victim's testimony contains material inconsistencies, suggesting a consensual relationship rather than coercion.
The court affirmed that consent of a minor is irrelevant in rape cases, reinforcing statutory protections and addressing evidential credibility.
The judgment reinforces the legal principle that the exploitation of a position of trust, particularly by a teacher towards a minor, constitutes a serious offense under both the IPC and the POCSO Act....
The appellate court upheld the victim's minority and the accused's guilt for kidnapping and sexual assault, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the need for compelling reasons to overturn ac....
Conviction under IPC 363, 376 and POCSO Section 4 upheld for enticing minor (under 18) by suicide threat and penetrative sexual assault; consent immaterial; victim's corroborated testimony and medica....
The burden of proof lies with the prosecution, and statutory presumptions do not relieve the prosecution from proving its case. Witness testimonies and evidence must be conclusive to establish guilt.
The court affirms that minor victims' testimonies can be solely relied upon in sexual offence cases, provided they are credible, and clarifies that penetration into external genitalia suffices to con....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
