SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Y.B.SURYAVANSHI, M.L.TIWARI, MEENA SAPRE
RAS MOTORS – Appellant
Versus
ADITYA JAIN – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. Justice Y.B. Suryavanshi, President— The appellant M/s Ras Motors, which was NonApplicant No. 1 in the original complaint filed by the respondent Shri Aditya Jain, has preferred this appeal being aggrieved by the impugned orders directing the appellant M/s Ras Motors (authorised dealer of M/s Hero Honda Ltd., New Delhi) and the second Non-Applicant i.e., the manufacturers M/s Honda Motors Ltd., New Delhi, to supply CD-100 Hero Honda Sleek Motor Cycle to the complainant/respondent Aditya Jain against the old price quoted, and further to give compensation of Rs. 2,000/- for the unreasonable delay in the delivery of the vehicle on failing to deliver vehicle the above said Non-Applicants would refund the entire amount deposited together with interest @ 18% p.a., besides the compensation of Rs. 2,000/- above said, and also the entire costs of the complaint case and the execution together with pleaders fees (though those have not been quantified), failing which the Non-Applicants will face consequences embodies in Section 27 of the Consumers Protection Act, for bravity called COPRA..

2. It is not in dispute that the appellant M/s Ras Motors are authorised dealers of M/s Hero Hond




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top