Y.B.SURYAVANSHI, M.L.TIWARI, MEENA SAPRE
RAS MOTORS – Appellant
Versus
ADITYA JAIN – Respondent
Mr. Justice Y.B. Suryavanshi, President— The appellant M/s Ras Motors, which was NonApplicant No. 1 in the original complaint filed by the respondent Shri Aditya Jain, has preferred this appeal being aggrieved by the impugned orders directing the appellant M/s Ras Motors (authorised dealer of M/s Hero Honda Ltd., New Delhi) and the second Non-Applicant i.e., the manufacturers M/s Honda Motors Ltd., New Delhi, to supply CD-100 Hero Honda Sleek Motor Cycle to the complainant/respondent Aditya Jain against the old price quoted, and further to give compensation of Rs. 2,000/- for the unreasonable delay in the delivery of the vehicle on failing to deliver vehicle the above said Non-Applicants would refund the entire amount deposited together with interest @ 18% p.a., besides the compensation of Rs. 2,000/- above said, and also the entire costs of the complaint case and the execution together with pleaders fees (though those have not been quantified), failing which the Non-Applicants will face consequences embodies in Section 27 of the Consumers Protection Act, for bravity called COPRA..
2. It is not in dispute that the appellant M/s Ras Motors are authorised dealers of M/s Hero Hond
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.