D.R.VITHAL RAO, SUSHEELA CHELUVARAJU
SUDHIR G. RAO – Appellant
Versus
KOKILA – Respondent
Mr. Justice D.R. Vithal Rao, President— In this complaint, under Section 17 read with Section 12 of the Act, the complainant has sought direction to opposite party Nos. 5 & 6, the Builders, to handover the possession of the Flat bearing No. B-002 in the ground floor of the Multistoreyed building constructed on the ‘Schedule A’ property, facing Setlur Road, described in `Schedule-B’ and also a compensation of a sum of Rs. 5,00,000/- from opposite party Nos. 5 to 7.
2. Opposite party Nos. 1 to 3 are the owners of the land. Opposite party Nos. 4, 5 and 6 are the builders.
3. It is the case of the complainant that opposite party Nos. 1 to 3 entered into an agreement with opposite party No. 4 to develop the land bearing No. 4, Setlur Street, Langford Town, Bangalore, described in Schedule-A, attached to the complaint. It was agreed to construct a multistoreyed residential apartments known as ‘Supreme Residency’.
4. The complainant entered into an agreement with opposite party No. 4 for the purchase of a flat, the Ground floor apartment bearing No. B-002, facing Setlur Road, as described in Schedule-B of the complaint for a sum of Rs. 9,03,125/- in addition to which the complainant was
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.