JUNIOR ENGINEER. DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS VS SANTOSH DEVI SHARMA

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

RIPUSUDAN DAYAL, G.P.PRADHAN, C.K.CINTURY
JUNIOR ENGINEER. DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS – Appellant
Versus
SANTOSH DEVI SHARMA – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellants :Mr. S.P. Wangdi, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. A. Moulik, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice Ripusudan Dayal, President— This appeal is directed against the order dated 8.7.95 passed by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, West District, dismissing the application filed by the appellants for setting aside the ex-parte order passed by the Forum on 28.11.94. We have heard learned Counsel for the parties. The National Commission held in General Manager, Telecom Rajkot v. Jayanti Lal Hemchand Gandhi, III (1993) CPJ 273 (NC)=(1993) 1 CTJ 843, that under the Consumer Protection Act, there is no provision for restoration of a cause dismissed in default.

The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs.

Appeal dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document