SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

N.C.SHARMA, SUBHASH PUROHIT, FIROZA BANO
SIPANI AUTOMOBILES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SUSHEELA GUPTA – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. Justice Navin Chandra Sharma, President — All the above mentioned appeals and revisions would be decided by a common order as they involve identical questions of fact and law. In all these matters M/s. Sipani Automobiles is a party and they relate to the refund of the booking amount of the car manufactured by M/s. Sipani Automobiles upon cancellation of the booking order.

2. Appeal No. 1324/94 is against the order of the District Forum, Jaipur dated 10.1.94 whereby the District Forum directed M/s. Sipani Automobiles and M/s. Sobhag Agencies to refund the booking amount of Rs. 10,000/- with respect to the car alongwith interest at 7% p.a. from 17.6.89 to 25.9.92 and thereafter at 13% p.a. and Rs. 500/- as costs. Similarly Revision No. 151/95 is against the order of the District Forum, Udaipur dated 10.8.94 whereby refund of the booking amount of Rs. 10,000/- was allowed in favour of the complainant and against M/s. Sipani Automobiles Ltd. with interest. Revision No. 160/95 has been filed by the complainant against the order of the District Forum, Jaipur 1st whereby the application of the complainant under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 was dismissed by the D















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top