SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Mukesh Pravinchandra Shah – Appellant
Versus
Managing Director, Sipan Automobiles Ltd. and Ors. – Respondent


ORDER(ORAL)

S.A. Shah, President The opposite party viz. M/s. Sipani Automobiles Limited(hereinafter referred to as the Company) are the manufacturers of diesel and petrol car named as Montanna.

2. That reading the advertisement in the local newspapers, the complainant contacted the dealers M/s. Vinipsan Agencies at Ahmedabad to get the information about Montanna Diesel Car to be manufactured by the Company at Bangalore. He was given the literature and application form for booking. The complainant was interested in the diesel car which was advertised to give an average of 29 kms. and the expected cost per kilometer which was advertised was 0.14 paise whereas the cost of the car was Rs. 90,000/- which was to be delivered at Ahmedabad through the dealers.

3. Being tempted by such specifications and offer the complainant booked the car with the dealer and deposited Rs. 10,000/- by cheque dated 14.3.1989 in the DCO Bank, Ahmedabad in the account of M/s. Sal Car on 14:3.1989. Due acknowledgement was received from DCO Bank which has been produced by the complainant

4. Thereafter the complainant received the allotment intimation of Montanna car, the allotment number being 00 1 M and priority

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top