SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DESH BANDHU AGGARWAL, A.P.CHOWDHRI
A. P. BHATNAGAR, NIRMALA BHATNAGAR – Appellant
Versus
N. K. PATNAIK – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. A.P. Chowdhri, President—Brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that Smt. Nirmala Bhatnagar (complainant No. 2) wife of Shri Atma Prakash Bhatnagar (complainant No. 1), aged 68 suffered from Herpes Zoster on the left side of the head, forehead and swelling on the left side eyebrow in June-July, 1989. After about three weeks, the swelling subsided but itching continued. Thereafter she suffered from inflammation and infection of the eyes at times for which she took treatment in January-March, 1991. She also suffered from Uvietis for which she was treated at the A.I.I.M.S. (AIIMS). On July 2,1991, she consulted the opp. party Dr. N.K. Patnaik, Eye Specialist, with regard to the cataract in the left eye. She paid Rs. 100/- as consultation fee. She was told that the cataract was mature and required to be operated and with Intra Ocular implantation her eyesight would improve in the left eye. She was further informed that the operation would be performed with YAG Laser. She agreed and accordingly the operation was performed by Dr. Patnaik on 8.7.91. She paid Rs. 5,500 /- on account of operation fee and cost of Intra Ocular Lens (IOL) and Rs. 485/- as hospital charges. She was







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top