SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KRISHANA TANDON, I.D.BALI, P.N.NAG
EICHER MOTORS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SUKHDEV SHARMA – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellants :Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Advocate.
For the Respondents: None.

ORDER

Mr. Justice P.N. Nag, President—This application seeks to recall our order dated 7.10.1998. On 7.10.1998, we dismissed the appeal, as nobody appeared for the appellants inspite of service. The matter could not be adjourned further, as the case was very old and the appeal related to the year 1996. No sufficient cause has been shown as to why the appellants were not present on that date. The only ground taken in the application is that the Counsel did not inform the appellants about the decision of the appeal and that such decision has caused mis-carriage of justice and that this Forum had no jurisdiction in the matter. Such grounds do not explain as to why the appellants or their Counsel could not appear in the Court on 7.10.1998. The application is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed.

2. Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Counsel for the applicants/appellants, however, time and again contends that he has got a very good case on merits and this Forum has no jurisdiction in the matter and the complaint was time barred.

3. It is not necessary to decide these questions as we have dismissed the application for restoration of the appeal. However, with a view to satisfying ourselves in the int










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top