N.G.NANDI, JATIN P.VAIDYA
JAGRUT NAGRIK – Appellant
Versus
JALARAM HOSPITAL – Respondent
Dr. Jatin P. Vaidya, Member—This complaint is filed by Jagrut Nagrik- authorised representative of complainant Nos. 2, 3 and 4 against the opponent Nos. 1 to 5. Complainant No. 2 is the one who allegedly suffered. Complainant No. 3 is the father of complainant No. 2. Ms. Vandana, Complainant No. 4 is the mother of complainant No. 2.
2. It is important to note that during the pendency of the case complainant No. 3 has died on 6.7.2001 and was deleted as party by order dated 13.2.2003. Complainant Nos. 1 and 4 have also stated that opponent No. 3 Dr. Milan Nane and opponent No. 4 Medical Superintendent, Mayo Hospital are formal parties and no allegations stand against them and complainants do not press any relief against them.
3. Complainants state that complainant No. 2 is 19 years old who has studied up to standard 10th and now is in standard 11th with bright career working as a model in T.V. Ads. Opponent No. 1 is the hospital where complainant No. 2 took treatment, opponent No. is M.D., Gynec. and practising as a Gynaecologist, running her own nursing home in name of Navjivan Clinic at Baroda. Opponent No. 3 Dr. Nane is the surgeon who was to operate complainant No. 2. Opponen
1. Mumbai Grahak Panchayat v. Dr. Mrs. Rashmi B. Fadnavis & Ors.
2. Harjot Ahluwalia (Minor) through Parents v. Spring Meadows Hospital & Ors.
3. Prasanth S. Dhananka v. Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences and Ors.
4. K.G. Krishnan v. Praveen Kumar (Minor)
5. G.D. Jiladia v. Minor Dharmistha Chhotubhai Goswami & Anr.
6. Meenakshi Mission Hospital & Research Centre v. Samuraj & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.