V. Bakthavatsalu, President — The Opposite Parties are the appellants. The respondent/Complainant has filed the complaint for directing the Opposite Parties to pay Rs. 1,25,000/- with interest and compensation of Rs.50,000/-

2. The case of the complainant is as follows:

The complainant joined the 1st Opposite Party college which belongs to the 2nd Opposite Party through CENTAC for the first year M.B.B.S. during the academic year 2001-02. The complainant paid Rs.1,20,000/- to the lst Opposite Party on 17.04.2002 towards tuition fee, deposit, etc. Thereafter, the complainant got seat in J1PMER in July 2002 and discontinued the 1st Opposite Party institution. The complainant and their family members made several demands for the refund of the amount paid by the complainant. But the Opposite Parties failed to refund the amount. The act of the Opposite Parties caused mental agony and suffering to the complainant. Therefore, the complainant has come forward with this complaint.

3. The case of the Opposite Parties is as follows:

The complainant and her father executed a joint undertaking in the application stating that they would not claim any refund of fee. In the prospectus also it is m