SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.N.KAPOOR, B.K.TAIMNI
K. Vidhyullatha – Appellant
Versus
R. Bhagawathy – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the parties :
For the Appellant :K.P.S. Rao, Advocate.
For the Respondent:S.M. Rao, Advocate.

ORDER

S.N. Kapoor, Presiding Member — This appeal is directed against an order of the Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hydera-bad in C.D. No. 21 of 1992 dated 9-2-2001 directing the Opposite Party Appellant

to pay a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- towards damages and Rs. 50,000/- spent on dia-lysis and other medical and hospital charges totalling to Rs. 1,50,000/- with interest @ 12% p.a. from the date of complaint till the date of payment.

2. The facts giving an occasion to this appeal are in brief as under:—

Smt. R. Bhagawathy (the Complai-nant) approached Dr. K. Vidhyulatha of the Latha Hospital, Gajuwaka, Vishaka-patnam on account of pain in her abdo-men. Dr. K. Vidhyullatha after examining diagnosed the disease as abdominal hysterectomy after using the prescribed medicines for about 3 or 4 months. There was no improvement. As advised by Dr. K. Vidhyullatha she was operated upon on 13th December, 1990. One bottle of A + blood group was transfused. The Complainant suddenly felt extremely uneasy and despite complaints the second opposite party did not pay any heed. Urine also stopped on 13th Decem-ber, 1990 and she started passing blood. On 17th December, 1990 when






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top