B.K. Taimni, Member —The petitioner was the complainant before the District Forum, where she had filed a complaint alleging deficiency in service on the part of the respondent, Rajasthan Housing Board (hereinafter referred to as Housing Board).

2. Very briefly stated the facts of the case are that the petitioner complainant got herself registered with the respondent housing board on 23.1.80 for allotment of an HIG category house under General Registration Scheme 1979 for which she deposited different amounts on different dates. By letter dated 30.4.93, house No. 33/37 of HIG category in Mansarovar Scheme at Jaipur was allotted to her by the Housing Board on outright sale basis. By this allotment letter she was required to deposit a sum of Rs.2,61,672 within three months from the issue of the letter. Since the house allotted to the petitioner complainant was partially constructed, surrounded by malba and built with substandard material, she declined to accept the allotment and claimed refund of deposited amount along with interest, compensation and cost. When this was not being done, a complaint was filed before the District Forum, who allowed the complaint and directed the Hous