S.COARI, P.K.CHATTOPADHYAY
WBSEDCL – Appellant
Versus
Arabinda Ghosal – Respondent
P.K. Chattopadhyay, Member—This revision application is directed against the orders date 22.9.2009 and 2.12.2009 respectively passed by the learned District Forum, Birbhum in CF Case No. CC/51/O/2009, where the complainant Mr. Vivekananda Ghosal, filed the complaint case under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 alleging deficiency in service on the OPs namely WBSEDCL, represented by Station Manager, WBSEDCL, Md. Bazar, Gr. E/S, P.O. and P.S. Md. Bazar, Dist. Birbhum, relating to his existing power connection and subsequent disconnection thereof along with an application under Section 13(3B) of the Consumer Protection Act for an ad interim order directing the OPs for restoration of the electric connection. On 22.9.2009 the learned Forum below in course of admission hearing fixed the date for S/R on 23.10.2009 and proceeded to pass an interim order under Section 13(3B) of Consumer Protection Act on the application of the complainant directing the OPs as under:
“Hence, it is ordered the petition filed under Section 13(3B) of C.P. Act, 1986 is admitted. This learned Forum orders the OP, WBSEDCL, represented by Station Manager, WBSEDCL, Md. Bazar, Dist. Birbhum to r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.