K.S. Chaudhari, Presiding Member—This revision petition has been filed by the Petitioner against the impugned order dated 20.9.2011 passed by the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai (in short, ‘the State Commission’) in CC No. CC/02/401 – Keshav Nidhi Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. v. Mr. Mooljee Lukmidas & Ors. by which, application for impleadment of parties was allowed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that Respondent No.1/Complainant filed complaint before the learned State Commission against OP / M/s. Moolji Lukhmidas with a prayer to direct OP to complete the title to the property and pay Rs.19.95 lakhs towards additional payment of stamp duty, registration charges, etc. Later on, complainant moved application for amendment of the complaint with a prayer to permit him to implead OP Nos. 2, 3 & 4 and insert paragraphs 9A and 9B in the complaint with the consequential amendment in the prayer clause. Learned State Commission after hearing both the parties, allowed aforesaid application vide impugned order against which, this revision petition has been filed.

3. Heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused record.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner