SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Mad) 659

K.GNANAPRAKASAM
Manimalan – Appellant
Versus
K. Subrayan – Respondent


Advocates:
T. Dhanyakumar, for Petitioner; S. Devika, for Respondent.

ORDER :- This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 21-10-2003, made in CMP No. 25 of 2003 in C.O.P. No. 31 of 2003, on the file of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Namakkal.

2. The respondent herein preferred a complaint before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Namakkal and during the pendency of the Complaint, the respondent filed an application to amend the name of the revision petitioner herein and the same was allowed. Aggrieved by the same, this revision has been filed.

3. Originally, the respondent herein filed the complaint against Manimalan in his individual capacity and thereafter he filed the application to change the petitioner as Managing Partner of the company and the said application was allowed and the same is challenged in this civil revision petition.

4. Heard the learned Advocate for the revision petitioner and the respondent.

5. The learned Advocate for the revision petitioner would contend that the Tribunal has no power to order amendment and therefore the order passed is vitiated.

6. On the contrary, the learned Advocate for the respondent would contend that though there is no express provisions for the amendment o



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top