K.GNANAPRAKASAM
Manimalan – Appellant
Versus
K. Subrayan – Respondent
2. The respondent herein preferred a complaint before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Namakkal and during the pendency of the Complaint, the respondent filed an application to amend the name of the revision petitioner herein and the same was allowed. Aggrieved by the same, this revision has been filed.
3. Originally, the respondent herein filed the complaint against Manimalan in his individual capacity and thereafter he filed the application to change the petitioner as Managing Partner of the company and the said application was allowed and the same is challenged in this civil revision petition.
4. Heard the learned Advocate for the revision petitioner and the respondent.
5. The learned Advocate for the revision petitioner would contend that the Tribunal has no power to order amendment and therefore the order passed is vitiated.
6. On the contrary, the learned Advocate for the respondent would contend that though there is no express provisions for the amendment o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.