SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

B.C.GUPTA
DLM Enclave – Appellant
Versus
Naresh Batham – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Prithu Garg, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Ritesh Khare, Advocate.

ORDER

Dr. B.C. Gupta, Presiding Member—This revision petition has been filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the impugnedORDER dated 20.05.2013, passed by the Madhya Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short ‘the State Commission’) in RP No. 54/2013, “DLM Enclave and Anr. versus Naresh Batham,” vide which the said petition against theORDER dated 30.04.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bhopal in complaint no. 668/2012, was dismissed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the complainant/respondent filed the consumer complaint in question before the District Forum Bhopal, alleging that he entered into an agreement dated 20.02.2000 with the petitioners/OPs according to which, he was to purchase a plot for his own use from the petitioners/OPs at village Chhapari (Ratibar), Tehsil Huzur, District Bhopal. Plot No. B-79, measuring 2000 sq. ft. @ Rs. 12/- per sq. ft was allotted to him. As per the agreement, he was required to pay the registration fee only at the time of execution of the registration deed. According to the complainant, he was required to make payment of Rs. 24,000/- for the 2000 sq. ft. plot










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top