K.S. Chaudhari, Presiding Member—Both these appeals arise out of one order of State Commission; hence, decided by common order.

2. Appeal No. 1138 of 2014 has been filed by the complainant and Appeal No. 1423 of 2014 has been filed by OP against the order dated 11.09.2014 passed by the learned State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi (in short, ‘the State Commission’) in Consumer Complaint No. 89/2011 – Pardeep Singh Pahal Vs. M/s. TDI Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. by which, complaint was allowed.

3. Brief facts of the case are that complainant applied for allotment of a shop in ‘Radeo Drive Complex’ in TDI City at Kundali, a project developed by OP and paid Rs.8,50,000/- as registration amount. OP allotted shop No. 205 having covered area of 536 sq. fts. and super built up area 800 sq. ft. vide letter dated 31.08.2006. As per demand of OP, complainant deposited total Rs.35,20,000/- towards this shop against total cost of Rs.44,00,000/-. This amount was deposited with a dream to have his own business, but OP has not handed over possession of unit till date even after 24 months from sanction of building plans. It was further submitted that on 6.3.2011, complainant found no