SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

K.S.CHAUDHARI
Ludhiana Improvement Trust – Appellant
Versus
Janinder Kumar Jain – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Shubham Bhalla, Advocate

ORDER

K.S. Chaudhari, Presiding Member—This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 01.07.2015 passed by the Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, 2nd Addl. Bench, Chandigarh (in short, ‘the State Commission’) in Misc. Appn. No.1126/2015 in Appeal No.603/2015 – Ludhiana Improvement Trust & Anr. Vs. Janinder Kumar Jain & Anr. by which, appeal was dismissed as barred by limitation.

2. Brief facts of the case are that complainant/Respondent No.1 filed complaint before District Forum and learned District Forum vide order dated 15.6.2010 allowed complaint and directed OP/petitioner to allot alternative plot of 150 sq. yds. in equally developed locality at old price and further directed to pay compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- on account of escalation of cost of construction, Rs.50,000/- for mental harassment and Rs.5,000/- as cost of litigation. OP filed appeal along with application for condonation of delay of 1776 days which was dismissed by learned State Commission vide impugned order against which, this revision petition has been filed.

3. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and perused record.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner subm















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top