SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J.M.MALIK, S.M.KANTIKAR
Krishna Malhotra – Appellant
Versus
Bajwa Developers Limited – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. A.S. Walia, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Karan Dewan, Advocate

ORDER (ORAL)

J.M. Malik, Presiding Member—Counsel for the parties heard. The only question which falls for consideration is whether the shop in question was purchased for commercial purpose or for self- employment?

2. The case of the petitioner / complainant Smt. Krishna Malhotra is that the Bajwa Developers Ltd., i.e. opposite party entered into the agreement with her dated 18.01.2012 Ex. C1, wherein she was allotted booth No. 421 (Ivy market) E10, S 123, Jandpur. The complainant paid initial amount of Rs.06,12,500/- through four cheques dated 23.12.2011. It was agreed that the booth would be handed over to the complainant on 25.08.2012 on which date the balance amount of Rs.18,36,000/- was to be paid. The complainant also deposited Rs.03,90,000/- through cheque towards part payment of the booth on 15.11.2012 as per the demand made by the opposite party.

3. The grievance of the complainant is that the booth in question was not given to her. In October, 2013 the opposite party informed her that it had abandoned the plan of constructing Ivy market. That plan had failed. The OP paid back Rs.09,62,500/- to the petitioner by arbitrarily deducting Rs.39,500/- from the payment made by the c













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top