SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.S.CHAUDHARI, PREM NARAIN
Kay Jay Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Daulat Alwani – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Amar Dave, Mr. Rohan Dheman & Mr. Ashish Virmani, Advocates
For the Respondents:Mr. Hari, Mr. Sanjeev Tyagi & Mr. Praveen Bhatia, Advocates

ORDER

K.S. Chaudhari, Presiding Member—All these appeals arise out of single order of State Commission involving common question of law; hence, decided by common order.

2. These appeals have been filed by the appellant against the order dated 23.1.2015 passed by the Goa State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Panaji (in short “the State Commission) in CC No. 17 to 21 of 2014 – M/s. Kay Jay Construction Co. Ltd. Vs. Daulat Alwani, M/s. Kay Jay Construction Co. Ltd. Vs. Ramesh Melwani, M/s. Kay Jay Construction Co. Ltd. Vs. Vinod Talreja, M/s. Kay Jay Construction Co. Ltd. Vs. Lekhpat Kalwani & M/s. Kay Jay Construction Co. Ltd. Vs. Ramesh Moorjani by which, complaints were partly allowed.

3. Brief facts of the case are those complainant/respondent were allotted flats by OP/appellant on different dates at different sale price as shown below:

CC No. & name of  complainant

CC17/14

Dates of  Power of  attorney 5/6/12

Flat Nos. C-11

Date of letters of allotment 4/1/07

Amount Paid 18,49,650

Date of receipts 19/3/09

Date of legal notices 15/1/14












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top