Mrs. Rekha Gupta, Member—This revision is directed against the judgment dated 01.12.2015 of the Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Raipur (‘the State Commission’) in First Appeal no. FA/15/02.

2. The brief facts of the case as per the petitioner/ complainant are that the petitioner was engaged in the business of drilling/digging bore-wells, which was the only source of his livelihood. The petitioner purchased on February, 2012 a Compressor against the Tax Invoice dated 04.02.2013 quoting the price as Rs.16,25,000/- only and the respondents were responsible. The compressor showed snags in the very beginning itself and despite repeated complaints and reminders thereto during the period gone by the respondents did not remove the defects, the machine could not function, the machine seemed to be beyond repairs. Finding the present machine irreparable and the respondents response bearing no fruit, the petitioner sent them a notice through his lawyer on 16.09.2013, but the respondents did not redress his grievance. The petitioner has been prevented, due to deficient service of the respondents from earning his livelihood despite making on the compressor such a h