SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.M.KANTIKAR
Satender Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Indraprastha Apollo Hospital – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Manoj Kumar Garg, Advocate with Mr. Pranut Sharma, Advocate

ORDER

Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Presiding Member—Brief facts are that the complainant, Shri Satendra Kumar, sustained accidental fall at home on 14.06.2012, suffered fracture of right leg. He was admitted in Indraprastha Apollo Hospital (OP 1). Dr. Raju Vaishya (OP-2) operated him on 14.6.2012, and discharged him on 17.6.2012. Thereafter, in the year 2013, on 23.05.2013 complainant again met with an accident and suffered fracture of left leg. He was taken to OP-1 hospital, operated by OP 2 and discharged on 25.5.2013. It is alleged that complainant never recovered fully after surgery, since two years he is unable to walk freely for a long time. Both the surgeries were not successful. The complainant time and again felt late night pain. The rod inserted in right leg got bent in the year 2014. Therefore, on 9.4.2014, another operation was performed by Dr. U. K. Sadhoo at Saket City Hospital, New Delhi. Old rod from the right leg inserted by OP 1 was taken out and complainant was discharged from Saket City Hospital on 12.4.2014 in the stable condition. Again, since January, 2016, complainant is facing severe problem in left leg during walking even with the help of stick. He consulted OP-2 ag






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top