SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

B.C.GUPTA
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Surinder Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate
For the Respondent: Nemo

ORDER

Dr. B.C. Gupta, Presiding Member—This revision petition has been filed against the impugned order dated 8.2.2013, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, U.T. Chandigarh (hereinafter referred as the ‘State Commission’) in First Appeal No.481/2008, Surinder Kumar vs. United India Insurance Company Ltd., vide which, while allowing the appeal, the order passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ludhiana on 3.4.2008, dismissing the consumer complaint filed by the present respondent, was set aside.

2. The facts of the case are that the complainant/respondent Surinder Kumar is the owner of a truck, bearing registration no. HR 17A 6024, model 2004 which was insured with the petitioner/OP insurance company, vide policy no.200601/31/04/062/4, valid from 27.3.2005 to 26.3.2006. The said vehicle is stated to have met with an accident during the currency of the insurance policy, for which a claim was lodged with the OP insurance company. As stated in the consumer complaint, the claim was not settled despite the complainant having provided the relevant information to the insurance company. The complainant stated that he had spent more than Rs.2 lakhs for













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top