SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B.C.GUPTA, S.M.KANTIKAR
Shamlal Ramlal Changoiwala – Appellant
Versus
Mukund Jagannath Bhusari – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate

ORDER

Dr. B.C. Gupta, Presiding Member—These revision petitions have been filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against the impugned order dated 01.08.2017, passed by the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Circuit Bench at Nagpur (hereinafter referred to as “the State Commission”) in two appeals, First Appeal No. A/15/207 and First Appeal No. A/15/208, both filed by the present petitioner, vide which, while dismissing both the appeals, the orders dated 03.02.2015, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Akola in Consumer Complaints No. 2014/56 and 2014/57, partly allowing the said complaints, were upheld.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of these cases are that the complainant Dr. Mukund Jagannath Bhusari as well as his wife Dr. Renuka Mukund Bhusari, the present respondents filed the consumer complaints no. 2014/57 and 2014/56 respectively against the appellant/opposite party(OP), alleging that they deposited a sum of Rs. 3 lakhs and Rs. 2.50 lakhs respectively with him on 28.03.2007 and 29.10.2009 respectively by means of cheques drawn on the Bank of Maharashtra. The OP issued deposit receipts for the same and also pa











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top