PREM NARAIN
R. V. Prasannakumaar – Appellant
Versus
Mantri Castles Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
Prem Narain, Presiding Member—This consumer complaint has been filed originally by 48 complainants against the Opposite Parties under Section 21 read with Section 12(1) (c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 alleging that the complainants had booked apartments with the OPs, however, the possession has not been delivered to the complainants by the OPs despite the committed date of possession having expired much earlier. The following prayers have been made in the complaint:
Direct opposite parties to handover possession of the fully constructed; completed flats without any further delay alongwith all permanent utilities promised as per agreement, copies of all relevant plans, approvals and Occupancy certificate issued by the relevant authorities.
Direct the opposite parties to grant to the 48 complainants/flat owners and other flat owners with same interest who will be impleaded after issuance of public notice, compensation for the entire period of delay @ 18% per annum on the amount deposited by the complainants with the opposite parties till the time actual possession is given.
Direct the opposite parties to provide to the complainants/flat owners and other flat owners with sa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.