SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

C.VISWANATH
Manager, Pace Motors – Appellant
Versus
Subair – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Bineesh K., Advocate

ORDER

C. Viswanath, Presiding Member—The present Revision Petition is filed by the Petitioner under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against Order passed by the Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Thiruvananthapuram (hereinafter referred to as the “State Commission”) in Appeal No. 206/2016 dated 25.04.2018.

2. In the Complaint Case, it was stated by the Respondent/Complainant that he purchased a black coloured Honda Motor Cycle bearing No. KL-14 L-4095 from the Petitioner/Opposite Party on 24.02.2012 for Rs.74500/-. After 7 months of purchase, the color of the vehicle started fading and the same was informed to the Petitioner. The Respondent alleged that the Petitioner had coated black color on a red vehicle. The Petitioner assured the Respondent to take necessary steps, but in vain. On 12.12.2012, the Respondent sent a notice which was refused by the Petitioner. Hence, the Complaint was filed.

3. The Complaint was contested by the Petitioner whereby he denied all the contentions of the Respondent. It was denied that the color of the vehicle started to fade out or red colour was seen beneath the paint. The Petitioner delivered black colored vehicle

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top