ORDER

V.B. Gupta, (P.M) - Petitioner/Opposite Party No.2 being aggrieved by impugned order dated 03.11.2010 passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana, Panchkula (for short, 'State Commission') has filed the above noted revision petition.

2. Respondent No.1/Complainant filed a consumer complaint before District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kaithal (for short, 'District Forum') on the allegations that he purchased one JCB machine manufactured by petitioner for a sum of Rs. 18,50,593.87P on 26.7.2007. The said machine was delivered to him on 27.7.2007. It is further stated that the said machine was defective from the date of delivery and did not work properly. Complaint was made to the petitioner as well as to Respondent No.2/Opposite Party No.1. On 29.072007, engineer was deputed who inspected the machine and tried to remove the defects but failed. It is further stated, that on 30.09.2007 another engineer visited the place and tried its level best to remove the defects but the same could not be removed, since there was manufacturing defects in the engine.

Consequently, respondent no.1 filed complaint before the District Forum, praying that defective machine