NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
J.M. Malik, P.M and Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Member
DR. INDU SHARMA - Appellant
Versus
INDRAPRASTHA APOLLO HOSPITAL AND OTHERS - Respondents
Consumer Case No. 104 of 2002.
Decided on : 22-04-2015
The complainant, a patient, filed a complaint against the hospital and doctor for medical negligence during childbirth, resulting in the birth of a child with cerebral palsy and subsequent death. The court analyzed the facts, medical literature, and expert opinions to determine the cause of the child's condition and the liability of the hospital and doctor.
Fact of the Case:
The complainant, a patient, underwent labor and delivery at the hospital under the care of the doctor. During labor, the doctor administered excessive doses of Syntocinon, a drug used to induce contractions, which caused fetal distress and cerebral anoxia-palsy. The child was born with cerebral palsy and died at the age of 12 years.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the hospital and doctor were negligent in their care of the patient and the child. The court found that the doctor administered excessive doses of Syntocinon, which caused fetal distress and cerebral anoxia-palsy. The court also found that the hospital failed to properly monitor the patient and the child during labor and delivery.
Issues: 1. Whether the hospital and doctor were negligent in their care of the patient and the child. 2. Whether the excessive doses of Syntocinon caused fetal distress and cerebral anoxia-palsy. 3. Whether the hospital failed to properly monitor the patient and the child during labor and delivery.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the hospital and doctor were negligent in their care of the patient and the child. The court found that the doctor administered excessive doses of Syntocinon, which caused fetal distress and cerebral anoxia-palsy. The court also found that the hospital failed to properly monitor the patient and the child during labor and delivery. The court relied on medical literature and expert opinions to support its findings.
Final Decision: The court partly allowed the complaint and ordered the hospital and doctor to pay compensation to the patient. The court also imposed punitive costs on the hospital.
ORDER
Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Member -
"The most important and emotional event in the life of a couple is the birth of a child and it's always a joyous occasion in the family when a newborn arrives. Most parents have a niggling fear that the nine months of pregnancy is comparable to walking through a minefield. Things can go wrong at any time. They only breathe a sigh of relief when they've counted all ten toes and fingers of their newborn. It's no wonder they feel that way because it can be the most devastating thing if your baby is born with a birth defect".
Complaint:
1. The complainant, Dr. Indu Sharma, B.A.M.S., (herein referred as "patient") during her first pregnancy, was under observation and follow-up of Dr. Sohni Verma, opposite party (OP-3) at Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, the OP-1. Previously, she took treatment from OP-3, for infertility, thereafter, spontaneously, she got conceived, after 4 years. On 10.6.1999, after midnight, due to rupture of membranes, she got admitted in OP-1 hospital for her delivery. No senior doctor was available at that time, the resident doctor examined her. In the morning, at around 7.00 a.m., Dr. Sohini Verma (OP-3) examined her and advised her medicines, started IV fluid with 1 ampule of Syntocinon (herein referred as "Oxytocin") for speeding up the process of delivery. But, the patient noticed that the dose was maximum, and the CTG machine showed that the heart rate of the child began to sink (80/min.), during the midnight of 11/12-6-1999. None attended the patient, immediately. Thereafter, the patient was shifted to operation theatre at 2.00 a.m. for emergency caesarean (LSCS), and at 3.36 a.m. a female baby (named "Nistha") was delivered by LSCS, weighing 3.7 kg. The baby did not cry immediately, after birth and it took almost five minutes. Therefore, it was alleged that, baby suffered birth asphyxia and seizures. The baby was kept on ventilator in NICU. The OP assured that all the reports were normal. The condition of baby deteriorated further, till 29.6.1999. The baby was unable to suck milk. Meanwhile, the patient was discharged on 16.6.1999, while the baby was discharged from OP-1, on 30.6.1999. The OP-1 did not issue entire medical record, CTG graphs etc. The complainant paid approximately 2.5 lakhs towards hospitalisation.
2. After 2 months, from 23.08.1999, the baby, Nistha, was admitted to Holy Family Hospital, for loose motions and strong clonic seizures from 23.8.1999. After doing EEG and C.T. Scan, it was revealed that the baby was severally affected by the atrophy of brain, which may lead to severally mental retardation. The complainant observed that her baby, at age of 1 year 8 months, the milestones were delayed, and the episodes of seizures persisted. Baby was unable to hold her neck and unable to suck milk. Therefore, the complainant had to appoint a special nurse for her care. Further, from 21.09.1999 to 03.12.2002, the child was treated at AIIMS, where, the Paediatric Neurologist, Dr. Veena Kalra, opined that, a full term baby having such problems were because of the negligence during the delivery. The complainant alleged that OP-3 failed to perform LSCS within, 12 to 18 hours after rupture of membrane. It was abnormally delayed for about 27 hours. The OP-3 advised excessive dose of Syntocinon, which caused foetal distress and cerebral anoxia- palsy. The child was further investigated by CT scan and x-ray reports, but the OP declared reports as normal. In this regard, the complainant sought opinion of doctors in USA and from her brother, who is a paediatric surgeon, in USA. The opinion was that severe atrophy of baby's brain cortex due to birth asphyxia and the child might remain severally mentally retarded for as long as she lives. The Disability Board of AIIMS, New Delhi certified the baby as 95% disability'. Nishtha survived for 12 years with disabilities and with mental retardation. Unfortunately, baby Nistha died on 15.1.2012.
3. Complainant further alleged that OP
Dr. Laxman Balakrishna Joshi v. Dr. Trimbak Bapu Godbole
Jacob Mathew (Dr.) v. State of Punjab
Kusum Sharma v. Batra Hospital and Medical Research Centre
Malay Kumar Ganguly v. Dr. Sukumar Mukherjee
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Kusuma
Postgraduate Institute of Medial Education and Research, Chandigarh v. Jaspal Singh
Spring Meadows Hospital v. Harjol Ahluwalia through K.S. Ahluwalia
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.