B.C.GUPTA, PREM NARAIN
S. D. O. `OP` SUB DIVISION – Appellant
Versus
MUKHTAIR SINGH – Respondent
ORDER
Prem Narain, Member.—The present revision petition has been filed under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, challenging the order dated 9.2.2006 in FA No. 2659/2005 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana (hereinafter referred to as "the State Commission"). By the impugned order, the appeal filed against the order dated 16.9.2005 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kaithal in Complaint Case No. 376/03 has been dismissed along with the application seeking condonation of delay for 57 days in filing the appeal.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the complainants are agriculturalists, using tube wells to irrigate their agricultural land. The Complainants have electricity connection for running their tube wells. The electric Consumer A/C No. of Complainant No. 1 is D-219-AP and Complainant No. 2 is D-247-AP in village Simla. The complainants are consumers of electricity supplied by O.P. No. 1. It is the case of the complainants that there was a newly installed transformer in the fields of the complainants, installed in the name of Mewa at Village Simla. The new transformer replaced 100KVA transformer as the comp
Esha Bhattacharjee Vs. Managing Committee of Raghunathpur Nafar Academy
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.