SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.S.SHARMA, HEENA THAKKAR
JAI PRAKASH SAHU – Appellant
Versus
TATA MOTORS LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K. Bhawnani, Advocate, for the Appellant; Santosh Tiwari, Advocate, for the Respondent

ORDER

R.S. Sharma, President - This appeal is directed against the order dated 07.11.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Surguja - Ambikapur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum") in Complaint Case No.140/2012. By the impugned order, complaint has been dismissed by the District Forum.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the complaint are that : for operation of his business, the appellant (complainant) purchased Mini Truck Tata 407 bearing registration No.C.G.15-AC-0790 from the respondent No.2 which is manufactured by the respondent No.1 at the cost of Rs. 6,28,554/- with the financial help of Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Company Limited. Warranty and Guarantee of 36 months was provided in respect of the said vehicle. After 2-3 months of the date of purchase of the said vehicle, gear box no.2852531YY 846470 was having some problem, which was neither replaced nor got repaired by the respondents. The appellant (complainant) spent a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- in repairing of the said gear box and thereafter also the gear box was giving problem. In the gear box, there was manufacturing defect, which was not cured in spite of getting repaired the same due to which

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top