SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

M.SHREESHA, S.BHUJANGA RAO
CARE HOSPITAL, THE HEART INSTITUTE – Appellant
Versus
SURISETTY SANNIBABU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. G. Gopal Das, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. G. Ramgopal, Advocate, for the Respondent

ORDER

Mrs. M. Shreesha, Incharge President Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.350/2005 on the file of District Forum-II, Visakhapatnam, the opposite parties preferred F.A. No. 567/2011, whereas the complainants preferred F.A.No.568/2011 dissatisfied with the award of the District Forum. Since both the appeals arise out of the same order, they are being disposed of by a common order.

2. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the first complainant is the husband and complainants 2 to 6 are daughters and complainants 7 and 8 are sons of one Smt. S. Atchiyamma. The complainants submitted that Smt. S. Atchiyamma on 24.2.2003 complained of chest pain and immediately on 25.2.2003, the first complainant took her to one Mr. P. Ramana Rao, M.D. Asst. Professor of Cardiology, Visakhapatnam who after thorough clinical examination advised (i) Thread mill test, ultra sound test, blood test, urine test, ECG and x-ray and she underwent all these tests and again approached Dr. P.Ramana Rao who on perusal of the said tests suggested her to undergo Angiogram and Dr. Ramana Rao conducted Angiog

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top