ORDER

S.B. Mhase, President - Heard respective Advocates for the parties.

1. This is a suo motu Revision Petition taken up by the State Consumer Commission in view of powers vested in the State Commission under Section 17(1)(b) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for the sake of brevity). This Revision Petition is entertained suo motu by the State Commission under the following facts:

Respondent No. 1 is the org. complainant while respondent Nos. 2 to 5 are org. opponents. Intervener in this Revision Petition is the Consumer Courts Advocates Association. Consumer complaint No. 480/2009 has been filed by respondent No. 1 before the District Consumer Forum, Mumbai Suburban as against respondent Nos. 2 to 5. We need not go into the grievance made by the respondent No. 1 in the said complaint in the present Revision Petition. Suffice it to say that respondent No. 1 has filed said complaint in Marathi language as envisaged in Rule 6(1) of the Maharashtra Consumer Protection Rules, 2000 which were brought into force with effect from 16.2.2000. Said rule states that the language of the District Consumer Forum shall be Marathi and it explained that that for