A.K.BOSE, R.C.CHAUDHARY
RAM NATH MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
BHARAT KRISHI CORPORATION – Respondent
ORDER
Mr. A.K. Bose, Presiding Member.—Aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 16.10.2006, passed by the learned DCDRF, Bahraich U.P. in complaint case No. 106 of 2004, the appellant/complainant Shri Ram Nath Mishra has preferred the instant appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (Act 68 of 1986) on the ground that the impugned order is arbitrary, perverse and is bad in the eye of law. It was delivered without proper appreciation of law and/or application of mind on the basis of surmises and conjectures and therefore, it has been prayed that the same be set aside and he be granted compensation as prayed in the complaint otherwise, he will suffer irreparable financial loss.
2. From perusal of the records, it transpires that the appellant/complainant, after obtaining a loan from Central Bank, Payagpur, Bahraich purchased one H.M.T. Tractor Zeeter 5911 bearing Tractor No. 47838, Engine No. 34876, Chassis and Gear Box No. 37031 from the authorised dealer of H.M.T. M/s. Bharat Krishi Corporation, Bahraich for a sum of Rs. 3,85,000.00 on 20.6.2003. It has been alleged at para 3 of the complaint that the dealer, in spite of receiving the entire amount of transaction
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.