SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

A.K.BOSE, R.C.CHAUDHARY
RAM NATH MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
BHARAT KRISHI CORPORATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. S.S. Chaubey, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. R.K. Mishra, Advocate, for the Respondents

ORDER

Mr. A.K. Bose, Presiding Member.—Aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 16.10.2006, passed by the learned DCDRF, Bahraich U.P. in complaint case No. 106 of 2004, the appellant/complainant Shri Ram Nath Mishra has preferred the instant appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (Act 68 of 1986) on the ground that the impugned order is arbitrary, perverse and is bad in the eye of law. It was delivered without proper appreciation of law and/or application of mind on the basis of surmises and conjectures and therefore, it has been prayed that the same be set aside and he be granted compensation as prayed in the complaint otherwise, he will suffer irreparable financial loss.

2. From perusal of the records, it transpires that the appellant/complainant, after obtaining a loan from Central Bank, Payagpur, Bahraich purchased one H.M.T. Tractor Zeeter 5911 bearing Tractor No. 47838, Engine No. 34876, Chassis and Gear Box No. 37031 from the authorised dealer of H.M.T. M/s. Bharat Krishi Corporation, Bahraich for a sum of Rs. 3,85,000.00 on 20.6.2003. It has been alleged at para 3 of the complaint that the dealer, in spite of receiving the entire amount of transaction

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top