SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.M.KANTIKAR
Vaibhav Laxmi Builders & Developers – Appellant
Versus
Laxmibai Chinduji Puram – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Rohan Thawani and Mr. Anand Daga, Advocates

ORDER

S.M. Kantikar, Presiding Member—The revision petition has been filed under Section 21(b) of The Consumer Protection Act, 1986, hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’, challenging the Order dated 02.09.2016 of the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Nagpur Circuit Bench (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’) in the first appeal No.A/759/09 which dismissed the appeal filed by the builder co.- OP /petitioner and confirmed the order of District Forum.

2. Brief facts that the M/s Vaibhav Laxmi Builders & Developers (OP/ petitioner) agreed to sell a plot to the complainant for a consideration of Rs. 10,64,027/- vide agreement dated 01.02.2008. The payment was to be made in the installments but , on 01.02.2008 the complainant made part payment in one time of Rs. 5,00,000/-. The OP agreed to develop the plot within 3 to 4 months and execute the sale deed on or before 01.02.2009. The balance amount was agreed to be paid at the time of execution of sale deed. However, the OP failed to do so. The complainant being aggrieved by the deficiency in service of OP, that non- development of land and non- refund of the money, filed a complaint no 129/2009 before

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top