SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.M.KANTIKAR, DINESH SINGH
New India Assurance Company Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Lalit Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. C.K. Gola, Advocate

ORDER

S.M. Kantikar, Presiding Member—This Revision Petition has been filed against the order 27.02.2019 passed by the H.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Shimla (hereinafter referred to as “the State Commission”), whereby the Appeal No. 164 of 2018 preferred by the Petitioner herein has been partly allowed. The State Commission modified the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Shimla (in short “the District Forum”) and directed the Petitioner to pay to the Complainant 70% of the OD claim as assessed by Surveyor-Cum-Loss Assessor alongwith interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of filing of complaint till the date of realization.

2. Brief facts are that, the complainant Mr. Lalit Kumar is the owner of the vehicle ‘Mahindra Pick up’ bearing registration no. HP-06A-4287. The vehicle was duly insured with insurance company (OP) for the period from 25.04.2014 to 24.04.2015. During subsistence of the policy on 19.07.2014 at about 6:00 pm the vehicle met with an accident and got damaged on Rattanpur – Majhewali Road, PS Jhakri, Tehsil Rampur, District Shim

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top