JUDGMENT/ORDER :

Rekha Gupta, Presiding Member

1. The present revision petition has been filed against the judgment dated 27.07.2012 of the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at Mumbai ('the State Commission') in First Appeal no. 196 of 2012.

2. The facts of the case as per the petitioner/complainant are that the petitioner had opened a recurring deposit with the respondent no.3/ OP no. 3 post office on 24.01.2005 and was to pay Rs.5000/- per month. He alleged that he had deposited Rs.5000/- per month regularly in the post office till the end of 10.12.2009 through respondent no. 4/ OP no. 4, who was the agent of Mahila Pradhan Shetriya Bhachat Yojana. Entries were made by the agent along with the signature of respondent no. 4 in the card no. IEF 0082257. On maturity the petitioner demanded the amount of the said deposited amount, however, the same was not paid to him. He then filed a complaint with the following prayer:

Complainant's complaint may be kindly be allowed;

The opponent nos.1 to 4 be ordered that the complainant had opened a recurring deposit account vide no. 2618583 with amount of Rs.5,000/- per month accordingly the total amount comes to Rs.3,00,000/-