SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

V.B.GUPTA, VINAY KUMAR
Emaar Mgf Land Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Lalit Arora – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. H.L. Tikku, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shubhankar Sen Gupta, Advocate.

ORDER :

V.B. Gupta, Presiding Member

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh (for short as ‘State Commission’) vide its order dated 4.4.2012 dismissed the appeal of the petitioner, challenging order dated 21.10.2011 passed by Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-1, Chandigarh (for short as ‘District Forum’).

2. Facts in brief, are that the respondent/complainant was allotted Plot No.516 measuring 300 Sq. yards in Mohali Hills. Prior to allotment, respondent filled Advance Registration Form, and also enclosed a cheque as basic price @ Rs.10,000/- per sq. yards + E.D.C., as applicable per sq. yard as per the prevailing rate on allotment of PLC, if applicable. It was stated that the same was accepted by the petitioners/opposite parties. At the time of issuance of allotment letter/Plot Buyer’s Agreement dated 20.06.2007, mentioned the rate of plot at Rs.11,500/- per sq. yard instead of Rs.10,000/- per sq. yard, which was against the terms and condition of the Advance Registration Form. Respondent approached petitioners number of times, and requested them not to charge the price of the plot @ Rs.11,500/-. Petitioners assured the respondent that the excess amount, would be adj

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top