SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J.M.MALIK, S.M.KANTIKAR
Nagaraj Narayan Katti – Appellant
Versus
ITC Ltd. – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Complainants :Mrs. Sumedha Rao, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party :Mr. Ajay Agarwal, Mr. Siddharth Banthia and Ms. Carushi Sethi, Advocates, Mr. Shashank Moona, Advocate.

ORDER :

J.M. Malik, Presiding Member

The instant complaint swirls around the question of shares. The key question which falls for consideration is ‘whether the Shareholders or their Legal Representatives are ‘consumers’ under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986?’.

2. The present complaint has been filed by Shri Nagaraj Narayan Katti, complainant No. 1 and his wife, Mrs. Sushma Nagraj Katti, complainant No. 2.

3. ITC Ltd. Investor Service Cell, opposite party No. 1 issued various shares in the name of Shri Narayan Rango Katti and Mrs. Indira Narayan Katti, father and mother of complainant No. 1. The shares issued are as under:

(a)

150 shares under Certificate Nos. 12932 and 12933 dated 25.1.1955.

(b)

275 shares under Certificate No. 16096, 30252 and 30253 dated 20.3.1970.

(c)

70 shares under Certificate Nos. 59597, 60300 dated 14.11.1974.

(d)

99 shares under Certificate No. 122237 dated 10.2.1977.

(e)

118 shares under Certificate Nos. 201073 and 201074 dated 14.6.1978

(f)

142 shares under Certificate Nos. 278679 and 278680 dated 29.8.19

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top