UTTARAKHAND STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, DEHRADUN
B.C. KANDPAL, PRESIDENT, D.K. TYAGI, VEENA SHARMA, MEMBERS
Bharat Constructions-Appellant
Versus
New India Assurance Company Ltd. & Ors. - Respondents
First Appeal No. 176 of 2012
Decided on : 24-12-2014
Consumer Protection Act - Insurance Claim - Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Order dated 01.11.2011 - New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. R. Srinivasan, II (2000) SLT 520=II (2000) CLT 30 (SC)=2000 (2) Supreme 70 - State of Maharashtra and Another v. M/s. National Construction Company, Bombay and Another, I (1996) CLT 315 (SC)=1996 (1) Supreme 264 - Lakshmi Complex Welfare Association v. M/s. Suri Constructions and Others, III (2005) 1 CPR 193 (NC) - State of Bihar and Others v. M/s. Magadh Motors and Others, (1998) 3 CPR 304 - Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Vallabhbhai Narnbhai Dobaria, 2011 (1) CPR 396 - ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. and Others v. M/s. Pee Ess Sales, 2008 (3) CPR 141 - United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Jaganath Singh, 2009 (3) CPR 186 (NC) - The court discussed the legal provisions and interpretations related to the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and cited various cases to support its decision. The court emphasized that the earlier consumer complaint was withdrawn by the complainant after accepting the cheque in full and final satisfaction of the claim, and therefore, filing a fresh consumer complaint arising out of the same claim was not legally maintainable.
Fact of the Case:
The complainant's machinery was insured with an insurance company, and after an accident, the insurance company settled a partial claim. The complainant filed a consumer complaint for the balance claim amount, which was dismissed by the District Forum. The complainant appealed under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the earlier consumer complaint was withdrawn by the complainant after accepting the cheque in full and final satisfaction of the claim, and therefore, filing a fresh consumer complaint arising out of the same claim was not legally maintainable.
Issues: The main issue was whether the complainant could file a fresh consumer complaint for the balance claim amount after withdrawing the earlier complaint upon accepting a partial settlement.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the earlier consumer complaint was withdrawn by the complainant after accepting the cheque in full and final satisfaction of the claim, and therefore, filing a fresh consumer complaint arising out of the same claim was not legally maintainable.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and no order as to costs was given.
ORDER :
1. This is complainant’s appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order dated 28.08.2012 passed by the District Forum, Dehradun, thereby dismissing consumer complaint No. 317 of 2011.
2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case as mentioned in the consumer complaint, are that the complainant got its machinery (Vibratory Compactor L&T – 752 bearing Serial No. J 1458 and Chassis No. J07 G 1458) insured with the opposite party No. 2 – The New India Assurance Company Limited, A-34, Model House, New Tehri for the period from 25.06.2009 to 24.06.2010 for insured sum of Rs. 21,93,000/-. During the currency of the insurance policy, the said machine met with an accident on 06.08.2009 due to landslide and in the said accident, the machine was totally damaged. The complainant submitted the claim with the insurance company and submitted all the required documents. The complainant also submitted an estimate of repairs to the tune of Rs. 34,36,739/- issued by Venus Auto Traders, 1, Tyagi Road, Dehradun. It was alleged that on 21.06.2011, the opposite party No. 2 sent an e-mail to the complainant, whereby the complainant was informed that the opposite party No. 4 – surveyor has assessed the loss to the tune of Rs. 13,86,240/-. However, the claim of the complainant was not settled by the insurance company. Thereafter, the complainant filed a consumer complaint before this Commission on 05.08.2011, which was registered as Consumer Complaint No. 07 of 2011; M/s Bharat Constructions v. The New India Assurance Company Limited and others. In the said consumer complaint, the insurance company submitted a cheque of Rs. 13,41,240/- on 01.11.2011 and the said cheque was given to the complainant by the insurance company after acceptance of the same in full and final settlement and the consumer complaint was decided by this Commission in the said terms. It was also alleged that however the balance claim amount of Rs. 8,51,760/- was not paid by the insurance company and for payment of the balance claim amount, the complainant filed a consumer complaint before the District Forum, Dehradun.
3. The insurance company filed preliminary objections before the District Forum and stated that since the claim of the complainant has already been settled by the insurance company and cheque of Rs. 13,41,240/- has been given to the complainant on 01.11.2011 in Consumer Complaint No. 07 of 2011; M/s Bharat Constructions Vs. The New India Assurance Company Limited and others in full and final satisfaction of the claim and on receipt of which, the complainant has voluntarily withdrawn the consumer complaint filed before this Commission and hence the present consumer complaint arising out of the same claim, is not legally maintainable and is liable to be dismissed.
4. The District Forum, on an appreciation of the material on record, dismissed the consumer complaint vide impugned order dated 28.08.2012. Aggrieved by the said order, the complainant has filed the present appeal.
5. None appeared on behalf of respondent No. 4. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and have also perused the record.
6. There is no dispute with regard to the fact that arising out of the same claim, the complainant had earlier filed a consumer complaint before this Commission bearing Consumer Complaint No. 07 of 2011; M/s Bharat Constructions v. The New India Assurance Company Limited and others. The said consumer complaint was decided by this Commission per order dated 01.11.2011, which reads as under:
“Sh. M.K. Kohli, learned counsel for opposite party Nos. 1 to 3 has handed over the cheque amounting to Rs. 13,41,240/- before this Commission to Sh. Yudhvir Handa, learned counsel for the complainant, in full and final satisfaction of the claim. Learned counsel for the complainant has, thus, moved an application that in the light of the aforesaid circumstances, the complainant be permitted to withdraw the consumer complaint.
In
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. R. Srinivasan
State of Maharashtra and Another v. M/s. National Construction Company, Bombay and Another
State of Bihar and Others v. M/s. Magadh Motors and Others
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Vallabhbhai Narnbhai Dobaria
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. and Others v. M/s. Pee Ess Sales
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.