SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

N.P.KAUSHIK
SAYA AUTOMOBILES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
ANIL SHARMA – Respondent


ORDER

N.P. Kaushik, Member (Judicial)—M/s. Saya Automobiles Ltd., A-21/21, GT Karnal Road Industrial Area, Delhi-110033 the Appellant/OP1 has filed the present appeal against orders dated 13.3.2012 passed by the learned District Forum (North-West) Shalimar Bagh, Delhi-110088. Vide impugned orders learned District Forum passed the following directions against the Appellant/OP1:

“The complaint against OP2/OP3 is dismissed.”

2. Facts which are necessary for adjudicating upon the appeal and not in dispute are that the respondent No. 1/complainant Sh. Anil Sharma purchased a Maruti Omni Ambulance from the Appellant/OP1 vide sale letter/invoice dated 15.10.1996. An amount of Rs. 1,52,000 was paid to the Appellant/OP1. The deal for the purchase of vehicle was made with an understanding that the respondent No. 1/complainant Sh. Anil Sharma and would get 25% rebate on excise duty as per Maruti Sales Policy Bulletin dated 24.8.1996. Complainant Sh. Anil Sharma was running a nursing home under the name Capital Nursing Home and Hospital at C-3/7A, Rana Pratap Bagh, Delhi-110007. The vehicle was delivered seven months after the booking and on a further payment of Rs. 56,405 by respondent No. 1/com

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top