ORDER

Deepa Sharma, Presiding Member.—The present Revision Petition has been filed challenging the order dated 22.08.2017 of the State Commission in Appeal No. 867 of 2014 whereby the Appeal of the Petitioner was dismissed. The said Appeal had been filed by the Petitioner challenging the order dated 08.07.2014 of the District Forum in Complaint No. 629 of 2004 whereby the District Forum while allowing the Complaint, directed the Petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- on account o deficiency in service and a sum of Rs.50,000/- towards harassment and litigation expenses. Vide the impugned order the order of the District Forum was confirmed.

2. In the present Revision Petition the Petitioner has challenged the findings on the ground that there was no evidence on record to prove that the subject vehicle was having any manufacturing defects and hence the Foras below have wrongly concluded that the vehicle was having a manufacturing defect and thus has wrongly put the liability on the Petitioner to compensate the Complainant. It is argued that no expert opinion had been sought regarding the manufacturing defect. In support of its contentions the Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner has relie