HULUVADI G.RAMESH, K.B.SANGANNANAVAR, M.DIVYASHREE
H. Rajesh Madival – Appellant
Versus
Manager, M/s. Mahendra Navistar Automobiles Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER
Huluvadi G. Ramesh, President.—These are the Appeals filed U/s 15 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 aggrieved by the order dated 25.02.2016 passed in CC.No.66/2013 and 67/2013 by Raichur District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as District Commission/Forum and the parties as arrayed in the consumer complaint).
2. The Appellant and Respondents in both cases are one and the same and the facts, grounds and relief sought in these appeals are also common, hence these matters are clubbed together for recording the common judgment.
3. The brief facts of the case of the Complainant before the District Forum are: The Complainant submits that, he has purchased two Mahindra Navistra MN25 tipper/vehicle (manufactured by OP.1) bearing reg.no.KA-36A/3972 and KA-36A/3971 from the dealer/OP.2 for Rs.24 lakhs each and got it delivered on 11.04.2012 on loan-cum-hypothecation basis by obtaining the finance from L&T finance/financier and to repay the loan of Rs.77,000/- per month for one vehicle in 35 instalments. The said vehicles were purchased to use them on hire purchase basis to various customers and thereby earn money. The Complainant alleged that within 15 d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.