Parmod Kumar Madan VS DLF Ltd.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

C.VISWANATH, RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
Parmod Kumar Madan – Appellant
Versus
DLF Ltd. – Respondent

Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainants:Mr. Karan Dewan, Ms. Sweta Rani, Mr. M.L. Lahoty, Mr. Paban K. Sharma, Mr. Anchit Sripat and Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, Advocates, Mr. Raj Gupta, Proxy Counsel
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Pinaki Misra, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Ravinder Narain, Mr. Pravin Bahadur, Ms. Seema Sundd, Mr. Siddharth Banthia, Mr. Aditya P.N. Singh, Mr. Snehil Srivastava and Mr. Abhishek S., Advocates

ORDER

Heard Mr. M.L. Lahoty, Senior Advocate, for the complainants and Mr. Pinaki Mishra, Senior Advocate, Advocate, for the opposite parties.

2. This bunch of 34 consumer complaints were consolidated. Out of which CC/1415/2018, CC/1281/2018, CC/1365/2018 & CC/2562/2017 were disposed of with the consent of the parties on different dates. Remaining were heard together as in all these cases, the facts and reliefs are similar and have been filed against the same builder and in respect of the flats in same project. For ready reference a chart containing material facts of 34 consumer complaints are given below:-

Sr. No.	CC No. and Complainant Name	Date of Application /Date of Booking of Flat	Sale Price	Amount paid by the buyer on the date of filing of complaint	Possession of Flat offered as stated by opposite party
1.	CC/1162/2017 Pramod Kumar Madan	21.12.2012	13241800	12577245	16.03.2018
	CC/2163/2017 Mili Dingra & Lalit Dhingra	21.12.2012	14078582	12597667	16.03.2018
	CC/417/2018 Sanjay R

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

C.VISWANATH, RAM SURAT RAM MAURYAParmod Kumar Madan – AppellantVersusDLF Ltd. – Respondent

Cases Referred (10)

C.VISWANATH, RAM SURAT RAM MAURYA
Parmod Kumar Madan – Appellant
Versus
DLF Ltd. – Respondent