SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.K.AGRAWAL, S.M.KANTIKAR
Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS – Appellant
Versus
Julius Kachhap – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Anuj Jain and Mr. S.K. Tiwary, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. P.K. Yadav, Advocate

ORDER

R.K. Agrawal, President.—The present Revision Petition has been filed under Section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short, “the Act”), against the Impugned Order dated 25.07.2017 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Jharkhand at Ranchi (hereinafter referred to as “the State Commission”) in Revision Petition No. 06 / 2017. By the Impugned Order, the State Commission has dismissed the Revision Petition preferred by Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS/Opposite Party No.1 in the Complaint (hereinafter referred to as “the Hospital”), challenging the interim Order dated 02.03.2017 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ranchi (hereinafter referred to as “the District Forum”) in CC No. 231/2012 wherein the Application dated 09.01.2016 filed on behalf of the Hospital and its two Doctors, i.e. Opposite Party No.2 & 3 in the Complaint, was dismissed. In the said Application, a prayer was made on behalf of all the Opposite Parties to set aside the Order dated 02.01.2014 debarring the right of the Hospital to file its Written Version and to set aside the Order dated 03.09.2013 proceeding ex-parte against the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top