SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.K.AGRAWAL
Jignya Mittal – Appellant
Versus
Macrotech Developers Limited – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. Deepak Kr. Khushalani, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:Mr. Rahul Kriplani and Ms. Rhea Bhalla, Advocates

ORDER

R.K. Agrawal, President.—The present Consumer Complaint has been filed under Section 21(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”)by Jignya Mittal (hereinafter referred to as the Complainant), against Macrotech Developers Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Opposite Party ‘Developer’), seeking compensation for delay in handing over the possession of the Flat booked by her in the Project launched by the Developer in the name and style of “Lodha Codename Blue Moon / Lodha Park, located at Pandurang Budhkar Marg, Opposite hard Rock Café, Worli, Mumbai, within stipulated period.

2. According to the Complainant, the facts of the case are that the Opposite Party Developer invited applications for allotment of flats in their upcoming Project, “Lodha Codename Blue Moon / Lodha Park” (hereinafter referred to as the Project) assuring that valid approvals had been obtained by them. In response to mail/letter dated 24.01.2013 sent by the Opposite Party Developer alluring the Complainant to book a flat in the Project during pre-launch offer and assured that the possession of the Flat will be delivered lastly by 31.12.2017, by paying a booking amount Rs.9,00,000/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top