JOP International Ltd. VS Monika

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

T. P. S. MANN
JOP International Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Monika – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Shri Vishal Garg Narwana, Advocate
For the Respondent No.1: Monika in person with her close relative Karamjeet.
For the Respondent:Presence of respondent No.2 already dispensed with.

ORDER

Delay in filing of the appeal as mentioned in the miscellaneous application is condoned.

2. M/s JOP International Limited through its Chairman-opposite party No.1 has filed the present appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for challenging the order dated 13.12.2017 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Rohtak, whereby the complaint under Section 12 of the Act preferred by complainant Monika was allowed and the opposite parties directed to refund the amount of Rs.7,90,000/- along with interest @ 9% per annum to the complainant from the date of deposits till its actual realization and also to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- as litigation expenses to the complainant.

3. While filing the complaint, the complainant had averred that she had booked a 2BHK flat having an area of 1000 square feet with the opposite parties in their project at JOP PALMS, Sector 28, Rohtak and deposited an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- with the opposite parties. At the time of booking of the residential flat, the complainant was told that the cost of the flat would be charged @ Rs.1900/- per square feet and 10% discount was also given to the complainant. At the relevant time,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document